Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Friday, April 15, 2011
Rubric…Activity Reflection #7
This week for my graduate class we were to create a rubric to evaluate our students digital stories projects. According to Craig Mertler from Bowling Green State University, rubrics are “rating scales as opposed to checklists- that are used with performance assessments. ” Before I could even start creating my rubric, I had to decide which type of rubric I would like to create between an analytic rubric and a holistic rubric. Mertler stated that holistic rubrics allow teachers to grade a project as a whole whereas an analytic rubric allows teachers to grade individual parts of the project separately. He also suggested that if there are only a few correct answers to a project he feels that the analytic rubric is more appropriate to assess the students and the opposite is true for holistic rubrics. I choose to go with an analytic rubric for my students project because there are so many separate components that I feel is important to grade. I spent a lot of this week contemplating what percentages would be appropriate for the mathematics content and how much of the percentages would be appropriate for the technology that the students use for their project. At our school we have a separate elective class that teaches our students how to use technology and I do not know how much as a math teacher I should focus on grading them on how well they use the technology in their project when they have the opportunity in their elective to learn about technology. Understandable, coming from a teacher that is getting my masters in Educational Technology, I feel it is important for all teachers to integrate technology in some way into their classroom, but I am not sure how much emphasis to put on the technology when I am expected to teach math. But, then I looked at it from the perspective of one subject area to another. Every teacher at our school is required to integrate reading into the subject matter that they teach. In my opinion, integrating technology is just as crucial as integrating other core subjects areas into my math curriculum.
The two rubrics that I relied on to put together my own rubric was from University of Wisconsin – Stout and the NCSU Multimedia Mania Project Rubric. I felt that these two rubrics did an amazing job of defining different descriptors that will help me as a teacher decide what category each student falls into for each criteria in the rubric.
I decided to use iRubric to create my rubric for the Golden Ratio project. This program was very easy to follow and I felt that the tutorial videos were short and very informative. I liked that I could preview my rubric and see how a student would get a grade by clicking on the different levels of achievement for each criteria. I had a little trouble embedding the rubric into the PBworks page I created. I figured out how to do this, but I still have questions on how I can actually score each student’s project using iRubric. I think I have to actually set up a class within iRubric. I feel that before I actually use the rubric I created I need to do a little more research on this program before I turn in my final project for my graduate course.
Here is the links to the rubric I created.
Glogster and click on Step 4 - Evaluation & Rubric
or
Resources:
Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25). Retrieved April 13, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25.
Rubrics:
University of Wisconsin -Stout http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/pptrubric.html
NCSU Multimedia Mania Project Rubric
http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.mm.st.pdf
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Prezi-The Golden Ratio - Activity Reflection #6
This week in my Graduate course “Fundamentals of Technology for Educators” we were to create an example of a project we will be asking our students to create. While I started creating my own example of what I expect my 6th and 7th grade mathematics students to create I came across two problems. The first problem was that I did not provide enough links in my curriculum page from the week before for my students to find the answers to all the questions I provided for them to answer. I will have to go back and add some of the sites that I used to create my example that I saved in my Diigo account. My Diigo account is an online place for me to keep track of the different websites I have visited by bookmarking them by title so that I can revisit the sites at a later time.
The second problem that I came across was that the comments that were connected with some of the amazing and professional YouTube videos were very inappropriate. In the future, I feel that unless I know how to embed these videos into the curriculum page, it is not worth being called into my administrator’s office because parents and students are reporting all the inappropriate comments that Ms. Garver led them to for an assigned project.
After reading chapter seven from our textbook “Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom” by Shelly, Gunter, and Gunter, I realized how important it is to evaluate the different sites that I am providing for my students, so that they are getting the correct information from reliable sources. Although the content on the website is the most important in evaluating the site, I feel it is also important to see who is writing the information on the site and what companies, schools (university or school district), and organizations are affiliated with the site you are evaluating.
I am very excited for you to view my example. The question that comes to mind that I would love your input on is…Do I allow my students to see my example with all the answers to the questions that I provided? I don’t want them to just view my example and get the answers. Isn’t it important for them to do the research on their own?
Resources:
Shelly, G. B., Gunter, G. A., & Gunter, R.E. (2010). Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom Sixth Edition. Boston, MA: Cendage
Well here it is The Golden Ratio Prezi
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)